Effect of a proficiency-based progression simulation programme on clinical communication for the deteriorating patient: a randomised controlled trial

Breen, Dorothy, O’Brien, Sinead, McCarthy, Nora, Gallagher, Anthony and Walshe, Nuala (2019) Effect of a proficiency-based progression simulation programme on clinical communication for the deteriorating patient: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 9 (7). e025992. ISSN 2044-6055

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a proficiency-based progression (PBP) training approach to clinical communication in the context of a clinically deteriorating patient.
Design

This is a randomised controlled trial with three parallel arms.
Setting

This study was conducted in a university in Ireland.
Participants

This study included 45 third year nursing and 45 final year medical undergraduates scheduled to undertake interdisciplinary National Early Warning Score (NEWS) training over a 3-day period in September 2016.
Interventions

Participants were prospectively randomised to one of three groups before undertaking a performance assessment of the ISBAR (Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) communication tool relevant to a deteriorating patient in a high-fidelity simulation facility. The groups were as follows: (i) E, the Irish Health Service national NEWS e-learning programme only; (ii) E+S, the national e-learning programme plus standard simulation; and (iii) E+PBP, the national e-learning programme plus PBP simulation.
Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was the proportion in each group reaching a predefined proficiency benchmark comprising a series of predefined steps, errors and critical errors during the performance of a standardised, high-fidelity simulation assessment case which was recorded and scored by two independent blinded assessors.
Results

6.9% (2/29) of the E group and 13% (3/23) of the E+S group demonstrated proficiency in comparison to 60% (15/25) of the E+PBP group. The difference between the E and the E+S groups was not statistically significant (χ 2 =0.55, 99% CI 0.63 to 0.66, p=0.63) but was significant for the difference between the E and the E+PBP groups (χ 2 =22.25, CI 0.00 to 0.00, p<0.000) and between the E+S and the E+PBP groups (χ 2 =11.04, CI 0.00 to 0.00, p=0.001).
Conclusions

PBP is a more effective way to teach clinical communication in the context of the deteriorating patient than e-learning either alone or in combination with standard simulation.
Trial registration number

NCT02886754 ; Results.

Information
Library
View Item