A comparative study exploring the impact of assessment criteria on eliciting graphical capability

Conference code: 91898; Export Date: 23 February 2015; Correspondence Address: Seery, N.; University of LimerickIreland; References: Fish, J., Scrivener, S., Amplifying the mind's eye: Sketching and visual cognition (1990) Leonardo, 23, pp. 117-126; Norman, E., Seery, N., (2010) IDATER Graphicacy and Modelling, , Loughborough; Ritz, J., A new generation of goals for technology education (2009) Journal of Technology Education, 20 (2), pp. 50-64; Rasinen, A., An analysis of the technology education curriculum of six countries (2003) Journal of Technology Education, 15 (1), pp. 31-47; Dunbar, R., (2010) Informing Technology Teacher Education; Exploring the Effects of Contemporary Teaching and Learning, , PhD Thesis, University of Limerick; Ferguson Eugene, S., (1993) Engineering and the Mind's Eye, , Cambridge Mass, MIT Press; Dakers, J., The hegemonic behaviorist cycle (2005) International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15, pp. 111-126; Hansen, R., Technological learning and thinking: A statement on the pedagogical terrain (2010) TL&T Conference, Vancouver, , British Columbia June 17-21, 2010; McGarr, O., The elephant in the room: The influence of prevailing pedagogical practice on the integration of Design and Communication Graphics in the post-primary classroom (2010) Graphicacy and Modelling, pp. 121-129. , Norman, E. and Seery, N. (Eds); Seery, N., Lane, D., Canty, D., Pedagogical challenges facing design and communication (2010) Proceeding of the 65th Engineering Design Graphics Division of the ASEE Mid Year Conference, , Michigan; Wiliam, D., What counts as evidence of educational achievement? the Role of constructs in the pursuit of equity in assessment (2010) Review of Research in Eduaction, 34, p. 254; Hanson, F.A., (1993) Testing Testing: Social Consequences of the Examined Life, , Berkeley: University of California Press; Davies, A., Assessment and transferable skills in art and design (1996) International Journal of Art and Design Education, 3, pp. 327-331; Baynes, K., Models of Change: The future of design education (2010) Design and Technology: An International Journal, 15 (3), pp. 10-17; Pryor, J., Torrence, H., Formative assessment in the classroom: Where psychological theory meets social practice (1998) Social Psychology of Education, 2, pp. 151-176; Sadler, D., Royce, Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems (1989) Instructional Science, 18, pp. 119-144; Rust, C., O'donovan, B., Price, M., A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice (2005) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (3), pp. 231-240; Lane, D., Seery, N., Gordon, S., A paradigm for promoting visual synthesis through freehand sketching (2010) Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 15 (3), p. 23; Kimbell, R., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wosniak, A., Kelly, V., The assessment of performance in design and technology (1991) School Examinations and Assessment Council/Central Office of Information, , London; Barrett, H., Carney, J., Conflicting paradigms and competing purposes in electronic portfolio development (2005) Educational Assessment; Paulson, F.L., Paulson, P.R., (1994) Assessing Portfolios Using the Constructivist Paradigm, , American Educational Research Association; Argyris, C., Teaching smart people how to learn (1991) Harvard Business Review, 4, p. 2; Sinatra, G., Southerland, S., Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution (2003) Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (5), pp. 510-528; Paulsen, M., Feldman, K., Student motivation and epistemological beliefs (1999) New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1999, 78, pp. 17-25; Barlex, D., Trebell, D., Design-without-make: Challenging the conventional approach to teaching and learning in a design and technology classroom (2008) International Journal of Technology Design Education, pp. 119-138