Export Date: 23 February 2015; CODEN: JCEDA; Correspondence Address: O Dwyer, A.; National Centre for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning, Main Building, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; email: anne.m.odwyer@ul.ie; References: Dwyer A, O., Childs, P.E., (2011) Second-Level Irish Pupils and Teachers View of Difficulties in Organic Chemistry, , European Science Education Research Association (ESERA): Lyon, France; Dwyer A, O., Childs, P.E., Hanly, N., Difficulties with Organic Chemistry at Third-Level - Perspectives of Irish students and lecturers (2011) Eurovariety in Chemistry Education, , Bremen; Chemistry Leaving CertificateExamination 2005, Chief Examiners Report, , http://www.examinations.ie/archive/examiners_reports/cer_2005/ LC_Chemistry.pdf, State Examinations Commission (SEC) accessed May 2014; Chemistry Leaving CertificateExamination 2008, Chief Examiners Report, , http://www.examinations.ie/archive/examiners_reports/cer_2008/ LC_Chemistry_2008.pdf, State Examinations Commission (SEC) accessed May 2014; State Examination Statistics, , http://www.examinations.ie/index.php?l=en&mc=st&sc=r13, State Examinations Commission (SEC) accessed May 2014; (1999) Leaving Certificate Chemistry Syllabus, , Department of Education and Science. Government Publications: Dublin, Ireland; http://www.examinations.ie/archive/exampapers/2013/LC022ALP000EV.pdf, State Examinations Commission (SEC). ExaminationMaterialArchive- Examination papers, (accessed May 2014)Bhattacharyya, G., Bodner, G.M., It gets me to the product: How students propose Organic Mechanisms (2005) J. Chem. Educ., 82, pp. 1402-1406; Johnstone, A.H., Chemical Education Research in Glasgow in perspective (2006) Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 7, pp. 49-63; Rushton, G.T., Hardy, R.C., Gwaltney, K.P., Lewis, S.E., Alternative conceptions of Organic Chemistry topics among fourth year chemistry students (2006) Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, pp. 122-130; Shayer, M., Adey, P., (1981) Towards A Science of Science Teaching, p. 92. , Heinemann Educational Books: London - 97; Ingle, R., Shayer, M., Conceptual demand in Nuffield "̃O level Chemistry (1971) Educ. Chem., 8, pp. 182-183; Shayer, M., Ginsburg, D., Coe, R., Thirty years on- A large anti-Flynn effect? the Piagetian test volume and heaviness norms 1975-2003 (2007) Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 77, pp. 25-41; Childs, P.E., Sheehan, M., (2010) Proceedings of the 21st Biennial Conference on Chemical Education, , Does the Irish Education system produce students who can think? In, Denton, TX, August 1-5; Sheehan, M., (2010) Identification of Difficult Topics in the Teaching and Learning of Chemistry in Irish Schools and the Development of An Intervention Programme to Target Some of These Difficulties, , Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Limerick, Ireland; Casey, M., Engaging and Challenging students in a Large Science Class (2011) Proceedings of the National Academy for Integration of Research Teaching and Learning, , National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland, June 9-10; Bodner, G.M., MacIsaac, D., White, S., Action Research: Overcoming the Sports Mentality Approach to Assessment/Evaluation (1999) Univ. Chem. Ed., 3, pp. 31-36; Barke, H.D., Harsch, G., Schmidt, S., (2012) Essentials of Chemical Education, , Springer-Verlag: Berlin; Bodner, G.M., Why changing the curriculum may not be enough (1992) J. Chem. Educ., 69, pp. 186-190; Reid, N., A Scientific Approach to the Teaching of Chemistry (2008) Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, pp. 51-59; Johnstone, A.H., Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem (1991) J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 7, pp. 75-83; Johnstone, A.H., Chemistry Teaching - Science or Alchemy? (1997) J. Chem. Educ., 74, pp. 262-268; Grove, N.P., Hershberger, J.W., Bretz, S.L., Impact of a spiral organic curriculum on student attrition and learning (2008) Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, pp. 157-162; Gravert, D.J., Two-cycle Organic Chemistry and the Student-designed Research lab (2006) J. Chem. Educ., 83, pp. 898-901; Sartoris, N.E., Two-cycle Organic Chemistry (1992) J. Chem. Educ., 69, pp. 750-752; Hume, D.L., Carson, K.M., Hodgen, B., Glaser, R.E., Chemistry Is in the News: Assessment of Student Attitudes toward Authentic News Media-Based Learning Activities (2006) J. Chem. Educ., 3 (4), pp. 662-667; Ratcliffe, M., Whats difficult about A-level Chemistry? (2002) Educ. Chem., 39 (3), pp. 76-80; Moore, J.W., Editorial: Assessment, Achievement, and Understanding (1997) J. Chem. Educ., 74 (5), p. 477; Branan, D., Morgan, M., Mini-Lab Activities: Inquiry-Based Lab Activities for Formative Assessment (2010) J. Chem. Educ., 87 (1), pp. 69-72; Fowler, L.S., An Application of Piagets Theory of Cognitive Development in Teaching Chemistry: The Learning Cycle (1980) J. Chem. Educ., 57 (2), pp. 135-136; Adey, P., (1999) The Science of Thinking and Science for Thinking: A Description of Cognitive Acceleration Through Science Education (CASE) Innodata Monographs 2, , International Bureau of Education: Switzerland; Montes, I., Lai, C., Sanabria, D., Like Dissolves Like: A Classroom Demonstration and a Guided-Inquiry Experiment for Organic Chemistry (2003) J. Chem. Educ., 80 (4), pp. 447-449; Hardinger, S.A., Book Review: A guide to Organic Chemistry Mechanisms: A Guided Inquiry Workbook (2009) J. Chem. Educ., 86 (8), pp. 927-928; Wepplo, P., (2008) A Guide to Organic Chemistry Mechanisms: A Guided Inquiry Workbook, , Curved Arrow Press: Princeton, NJ; Jones, M.B., Molecular Modeling in the undergraduate Chemistry Curriculum (2001) J. Chem. Educ., 78, pp. 867-868; Fleming, S.A., Hart, G.R., Savage, P.B., Molecular Orbital Animations for Organic Chemistry (2000) J. Chem. Educ., 77, pp. 790-793; Tasker, R., Dalton, R., Research into practice: Visualisation of the molecular world using animations (2006) Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 7, pp. 141-159; Johnstone, A.H., Teaching of Chemistry - Logical or Psychological? (2000) Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 1 (1), pp. 9-15; Bodner, G.M., Domin, D.S., Mental Models: The Role of Representations in problem solving in Chemistry (2000) Univ. Chem. Ed., 4, pp. 24-30; Bennett, J., Millar, R., Evaluating innovations in science education- Some reflections (2005) Making A Difference- Evaluation As A Tool for Improving Science Education, pp. 205-211. , Bennett, J. Holman, J. S. Millar, R. Waddington, D. J. Waxmann, Verlag GmbH: Berlin; Parchmann, I., Grasel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., Ralle, B., Chemie im Kontext: A symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach (2006) Int. J. Sci. Educ., 28, pp. 1041-1062. , ChiK Project Group; Hofstein, A., Kesner, M., Industrial Chemistry and School Chemistry: Making chemistry studies more relevant (2006) Int. J. Sci. Educ., pp. 1017-1039; Schwartz, A.T., Contextualised Chemistry Education: The American experience (2006) Int. J. Sci. Educ., 28, pp. 977-998; (2014) CHEMISTRY Is in the NEWS, , http://ciitn.missouri.edu, (accessed May); Seery, M.K., Donnelly, R., The implementation of pre-lecture resources to reduce in-class cognitive load: A case study for higher education chemistry (2012) Br. J. Educ. Technol., 43 (4), pp. 667-677; Schroeder, J.D., Greenbowe, T.J., Implementing POGIL in the lecture and the Science Writing Heuristic in the laboratory - Student perceptions and performance in undergraduate organic chemistry (2008) Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, pp. 149-156; Gaddis, B.A., Schoffstall, A.M., Incorporating Guided-Inquiry Learning into the Organic Chemistry Laboratory (2007) J. Chem. Educ., 84 (5), pp. 846-849; Schmidt, H.J., Conceptual difficulties with isomerism (1992) J. Res. Sci. Teach., 29 (9), pp. 995-1003; Taagepera, M., Noori, S., Mapping students thinking patterns in learning Organic Chemistry by the use of Knowledge Space Theory (2000) J. Chem. Educ., 77 (9), pp. 1224-1229; Taber, K., (2002) Chemical Misconceptions-prevention, Diagnosis and Cure: Vol. 1 Theoretical Background, , Royal Society of Chemistry: London; Anderson, T.L., Bodner, G.M., What can we do about Parker? A case study of a good student who didnt get organic chemistry (2000) Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, pp. 93-101; Rushton, G.T., Hardy, R.C., Gwaltney, K.P., Lewis, S.E., Alternative conceptions of Organic Chemistry topics among fourth year chemistry students (2008) Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, pp. 122-130; Domin, D.S., Al-Masum, M., Mensah, J., Students categorizations of organic compounds (2008) Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, pp. 114-121; Kind, V., Beyond Appearances: Students Misconceptions about Basic Chemical Ideas, , http://www.rsc.org/images/Misconceptions_update_tcm18-188603.pdf, accessed May 2014; Hassan, A.K., Hill, R.A., Reid, N., Ideas Underpinning Success in an Introductory Course in Organic Chemistry (2004) Univ. Chem. Educ., 8, pp. 40-51; Harrison, A.G., Treagust, D.F., Learning about atoms, molecules and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 Chemistry (2000) Sci. Educ., 84, pp. 352-381; Zoller, U., Students misunderstandings and alternative conceptions in College Freshman Chemistry (General and Organic) (1990) J. Res. Sci. Teach., 27 (10), pp. 1053-1065; Ferguson, R., Bodner, G.M., Making sense of the arrow-pushing formalism among chemistry majors enrolled in Organic Chemistry (2008) Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, pp. 102-113; Francisco, J.S., Nicoll, G., Trautmann, M., Integrating Multiple Teaching Methods into a General Chemistry Classroom (1998) J. Chem. Educ., 75 (2), p. 210
Tools
Tools
