'Thou shalt not plagiarise': From self-reported views to recognition and avoidance of plagiarism

Risquez, A. and O'Dwyer, M. and Ledwith, A. (2013) 'Thou shalt not plagiarise': From self-reported views to recognition and avoidance of plagiarism. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38 (1). pp. 34-43. ISSN 02602938 (ISSN)

Full text not available from this resource.
Official URL: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0...

Abstract

Throughout much of the literature on plagiarism in higher education, there is an implicit assumption that students who understand plagiarism, who have high ethical views and declare not to engage in plagiaristic behaviour are able to recognise it and avoid it in practice. Challenging this supposition, this paper contrasts students' self-reported data with their ability to recognise and avoid plagiarism in a proposed case scenario. A questionnaire was adapted from previous literature and administered to a sample of undergraduate first- and second-year students in an Irish university. Results show that self-reported measures are not a powerful predictor of the students' ability to recognise the practical case as an academic breach, nor to avoid the breach through referencing. This suggests that students' understanding and awareness of academic breaches would benefit from experiential learning and that higher education institutions should not merely rely on providing statements and definitions of academic misconduct. Also, the results highlight the potential unsuitability of using self-reported measures to study plagiarism, despite their widespread use. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Cited By :3; Export Date: 23 February 2015; Correspondence Address: Risquez, A.; Centre for Teaching and Learning, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; email: angelica.risquez@ul.ie; References: Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., Thorne, P., Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment (1997) Studies in Higher Education, 22 (2), pp. 187-203; Barry, E.S., Can paraphrasing practice help students define plagiarism? (2006) College Student Journal, 40 (2), pp. 377-384; Bermingham, V., Watson, S., Jones, M., Plagiarism in UK law schools: Is there a postcode lottery? (2010) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (1), pp. 1-14; Brown, V., Howell, M., The efficacy of policy statements on plagiarism: Do they change students' views? (2001) Research in Higher Education, 42 (1), pp. 103-118; Colnerud, G., Rosander, M., Academic dishonesty, ethical norms and learning (2009) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34 (5), pp. 505-517; Culwin, F., An active introduction to academic misconduct and the measured demographics of misconduct (2006) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31 (2), pp. 167-182; Devlin, M., Policy, preparation, and prevention: Proactive minimization of student plagiarism (2006) Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28 (1), pp. 45-58; Ellery, K., Undergraduate plagiarism: A pedagogical perspective (2008) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (5), pp. 507-516; Franklyn-Stokes, A., Newstead, S., Undergraduate cheating: Who does what and why? (1995) Studies in Higher Education, 20 (2), pp. 159-172; Landau, J.D., Druen, P.B., Arcuri, J.A., Methods for helping students avoid plagiarism (2002) Teaching of Psychology, 29 (2), pp. 112-115; Ledwith, A., Risquez, A., Using anti-plagiarism software to promote academic honesty in the context of peer reviewed assignments (2008) Studies in Higher Education, 33 (4), pp. 371-384; Lyndsay, R., Book review of "crisis on campus: Confronting academic misconduct" (2003) Studies in Higher Education, 28 (1), pp. 107-114. , By Decoo, W. (2002), Cambridge, MIT Press; MacDonald, J.C., Plagiarism - a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach (2006) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31 (2), pp. 233-245; McCabe, D.L., Trevino, L.K., Honor codes and other contextual influences (1993) Journal of Higher Education, 64, pp. 522-538; McCabe, D.L., Trevino, L.K., Individual and contextual influences on academic honesty: A multicampus investigation (1997) Research in Higher Education, 38 (3), pp. 379-396; McCabe, D.L., Trevino, L.K., Butterfield, K.D., Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension to modified honor code settings (2002) Research in Higher Education, 43 (3), pp. 357-378; Newstead, S., Franklyn-Stokes, A., Armstead, P., Individual differences in student cheating (1996) Journal of Educational Psychology, 88 (2), pp. 229-242; O'Dwyer, M., Risquez, A., Ledwith, A., Entrepreneurship education and plagiarism: Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies (2010) Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17, pp. 641-651; Park, C., In other (people's) words: Plagiarism by university students - literature and lessons (2003) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, pp. 471-488; Pickard, J., Staff and student attitudes to plagiarism at university college northampton (2006) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31 (2), pp. 215-232; Pittam, G., Elander, J., Lusher, J., Fox, P., Payne, N., Student beliefs and attitudes about authorial identity in academic writing (2009) Studies in Higher Education, 34 (2), pp. 153-170; Rettinger, D.A., Jordan, A.E., Peschiera, F., Evaluating the motivation of other students to cheat: A vignette experiment (2004) Research in Higher Education, 45 (8), pp. 873-890; Rettinger, D.A., Kramer, Y., Situational and personal causes of student cheating (2009) Research in Higher Education, 50 (3), pp. 293-313; Roig, M., Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized? (1997) Psychological Record, 47 (1), pp. 113-123; Scanlon, P., Neumann, D.R., Internet plagiarism among college students (2002) Journal of College Student Development, 43 (3), pp. 374-385; Selwyn, N., Not necessarily a bad thing: A study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students (2008) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (5), pp. 465-479; Trost, K., Psst, have you ever cheated? A study of academic dishonesty in sweden (2009) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34 (4), pp. 367-376; Uemlianin, I.A., Engaging text: Assessing paraphrase and understanding (2000) Studies in Higher Education, 25 (3), pp. 347-358; Vandehey, M., Diekhoff, G., Labeff, E., College cheating: A twenty-year follow-up and the addition of an honor code (2007) Journal of College Student Development, 48 (4), pp. 468-480; Walden, K., Peacock, A., The i-map: A process-centered response to plagiarism (2006) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32 (2), pp. 201-214
Uncontrolled Keywords: academic honesty; academic writing; plagiarism; university student
Depositing User: National Forum
Date Deposited: 10 Dec 2015 22:07
Last Modified: 10 Dec 2015 22:12
URI: http://eprints.teachingandlearning.ie/id/eprint/3600

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year