Educators’ Evaluation of Explanation Types in XAI for Higher Education Dropout

Maathuis, Henry, Glazenborg, Jan, Grol, Meike and Quille, Keith (2026) Educators’ Evaluation of Explanation Types in XAI for Higher Education Dropout. In: UNSPECIFIED.

Abstract

First-year student dropout rates represent a global challenge, particularly in Computer Science programs. In response, the Predict Student Success (PreSS) tool was developed over two decades using Naïve Bayes, a black box machine learning model, to identify students at risk of early withdrawal or academic failure. Given growing concerns about the use of black box models in high-stakes domains such as education, this study builds on former research by comparing the Naïve Bayes model to three glass box AI models: Decision Tree, Explainable Boosting Machine, and Automatic Piecewise Linear Regression. These models were used to generate four types of explainable AI visualisations: Feature Importance, Similar and Contrastive Examples, Decision Rules, and Counterfactuals. Educators evaluated these visualisations through a qualitative survey. Results indicate that glass box models can perform competitively with Naïve Bayes, and that contrastive explanation types were most preferred among educators. Open-ended responses underscore the importance of clear user guidance when implementing such tools.

Documents
8548:11790
[thumbnail of Educators’ Evaluation of Explanation Types in XAI for Higher Education Dropout — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/]
Preview
Educators’ Evaluation of Explanation Types in XAI for Higher Education Dropout — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
nfu-2026-1513.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (834kB) | Preview
Information
Library
View Item