Promoting professional judgement through peer debate in radiation therapy undergraduate curriculum

Kearney, Maeve, Roche, Cicely and Poole, Claire (2022) Promoting professional judgement through peer debate in radiation therapy undergraduate curriculum. Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology, 24. pp. 63-66. ISSN 2405-6324

Abstract

Radiation therapists (RTs) are often required to exercise professional judgement when faced with the ambiguity inherent in professional dilemmas not comprehensively accommodated by the professional Code of Conduct. Clinical educators therefore need to design curriculum that motivates students to apply professional judgement in ambiguous situations. Role play and peer debate enables development of competencies related to professional judgement. The aim of this short communication is to report on the rationale for and integration of peer teaching resources that prompt students to justify, through discussion and debate, the basis of their own judgement and those of their peers.

Documents
6954:10150
[thumbnail of Promoting professional judgement through peer debate in radiation therapy undergraduate curriculum — CC BY-NC-ND (version not specified by source)]
Preview
Promoting professional judgement through peer debate in radiation therapy undergraduate curriculum — CC BY-NC-ND (version not specified by source)
nfu-2022-0248.pdf - Published Version

Download (343kB) | Preview
Information
Library
View Item