Cited By :1; Export Date: 23 February 2015; Correspondence Address: Ohaja, M.; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, 24 D'Olier Street, Dublin 2, Ireland; email: ohajam@tcd.ie; References: Akister, J., Bannon, A., Mullender-Lock, H., Poster presentation in social work education assessment: a case study (2000) Innovations in Education and Training International, 37 (3), pp. 229-233; Alkaslassy, E., How often do students working in two-person teams report that work was shared equitably (2011) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (3), pp. 367-375; Beylefeld, A.A., Joubert, G., Jama, M.P., de Klerk, B., Lecturers, students and community members sharing the responsibility of assessing project-based poster presentation (2003) South African Journal of Higher Education, 17 (2), pp. 5-12; Boud, D., Cohen, R., Sampson, J., Peer learning and assessment (1999) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24 (4), pp. 413-426; Brooks, C.M., Ammons, J., Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessment (2003) Journal of Education for Business, 78 (5), pp. 268-272; Burnard, P., Amethod of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research (1991) Nurse Education Today, 11 (6), pp. 461-466; Burns, N., Grove, S.K., (2011) Understanding Nursing Research: Building an Evidence Based Practice, , Elsevier, Texas; Conyers, V., Posters: an assessment strategy to foster learning in nursing education (2003) Journal of Nursing Education, 42 (1), pp. 38-41; Falchikov, N.G., Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks (2000) Review of Educational Research, 70 (3), pp. 287-322; Hanrahan, S.J., Isaacs, G., Assessing self and peer assessment: the students' view (2001) Higher Education Research and Development, 20 (1), pp. 53-70; Harris, J.R., Peer assessment in large undergraduate classes: an evaluation of a procedure for marking laboratory reports and a review of related practices (2011) Advances in Physiology Education, 35 (2), pp. 178-187; Johnston, L., Miles, L., Assessing contributions to group assignments (2004) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (6), pp. 751-768; Leach, L., Neutze, G., Zepke, N., Assessment and empowerment: some critical questions (2001) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 (4), pp. 293-305; Lejk, M., Wyvill, M., Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a comparison of holistic and category-base approaches (2001) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 (1), pp. 61-72; Lejk, M., Wyvill, M., Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: students attitude to a holistic and category-base approaches (2002) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, pp. 569-577; Lejk, M., Wyvill, M., Farrow, S., Asurvey of methods of deriving individual grades from group assessments (1996) Assessments and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21 (3), pp. 267-280; Magin, D., Helmore, P., Peer and teacher assessments of oral presentations: how reliable are they? (2001) Studies in Higher Education, 26, pp. 287-298; Morris, J., Peer assessment: a missing link between teaching and learning? A review of the literature (2001) Nurse Education, 21, pp. 507-515; Moule, P., Judd, M., Girot, E., The poster presentation: what value to the teaching and assessment of pre-registration and post-registration nursing courses? (1998) Nurse Education Today, 18, pp. 237-242; Nicol, D.J., MacFarlane-Dick, D., Formative and self-regulated: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice (2006) Studies in Higher Education, 31 (20), pp. 199-218; Nordberg, D., Group projects: more learning? Less fair? A conundrum in assessing postgraduate business education (2008) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (5), pp. 481-492; Osmond, P., Merry, S., The importance of marking criteria in peer assessment (1996) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21 (3), pp. 239-250; Papinczak, T., Young, L., Groves, M., Peer assessment in problem-based learning: a qualitative study (2007) Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12, pp. 169-186; Price, M., Carroll, J., O'Donovan, B., Rust, C., If I was going there I wouldn't start from here: a critical commentary on current assessment practice (2011) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (4), pp. 479-492; Race, P., (2001) ABriefing on Self, Peer and Group Assessment, , Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN), York Science Park, York; Race, P., Brown, S., Smith, B., (2005) 500 Tips on Assessment, , Routledge, London; Shiu, A.T.Y., Chan, C.W.H., Lam, P., Lee, J., Kwong, A.N.L., Baccalaureate nursing students' perceptions of peer assessment of individual contributions to a group project: a case study (2012) Nurse Education Today, 32, pp. 214-218; Sluijmans, D.M.A., Moerkerke, G., van Merrienboer, J.J.G., Dochy, F.J.R.C., Peer assessment in problem-based learning (2001) Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27 (2), pp. 153-173; Streubert-Speziale, H., Carpenter, D.R., (2011) Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative, , Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia; Swaray, R., An evaluation of group project designed to reduce free-riding and promote active learning (2012) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37 (2), pp. 285-292; Topping, K.J., Smith, E.F., Swanson, I., Elliot, A., Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students (2000) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25 (2), pp. 146-169; Vu, T.T., Dall'Alba, G., Students' experience of peer assessment in a professional course (2007) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32 (5), pp. 541-556; Wharrad, H.J., Allcock, N., Meal, A.G., The use of posters in the teaching of biological sciences on an undergraduate nursing course (1995) Nursing Education Today, 15, pp. 370-374; Zhang, B., Johnston, L., Kilic, G.B., Assessing the reliability of self- and peer rating in student group work (2008) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (3), pp. 329-340
Tools
Tools
