Content analysis of computer conferencing transcripts

Donnelly, R. and Gardner, J. (2011) Content analysis of computer conferencing transcripts. pp. 303-315. ISSN 10494820 (ISSN)

[img] Text
Donnelly and Gardner 2011.pdf

Download (242kB)
Official URL:


Within the field of higher education, there are situations where the learner is not well served in a classroom setting. Problematic issues such as scheduling, critical mass, time, pace and location have the potential to be counterbalanced by elearning. Within this, the asynchronous nature of today's online learning environments and computer conferencing tools have popularly been claimed to offer tremendous benefits for learners who are willing to take responsibility for their own learning, to progress at their own pace, and interact with their online teacher to get immediate feedback on their learning and progress. Indeed, increasingly, educators today are very keen to exploit some of these new technologies for the benefit of their learners. It is argued in this article that there is a need to address the practice and research of asynchronous computer mediated conferencing. As conferencing tools become an increasingly common feature in students' experience, teachers need to have an understanding of how these tools facilitate the formation and maintenance of collaborative learning communities. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Cited By :2; Export Date: 23 February 2015; Correspondence Address: Donnelly, R.; The Learning and Teaching Centre, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland; email:; References: Ahern, T., Peck, K., Laycock, M., The effects of teacher discourse in computermediated discussion (1992) Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8 (3), pp. 291-309; Anderson, T., (2005) Units of analysis, transcript analysis discussion, ,, Retrieved April 2008, from; Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., Geva, A., Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks (2003) Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7 (3), pp. 1-23; Bales, R., A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction (1950) American Sociological Review, 15, pp. 257-263; Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M., Learning to work creatively with knowledge (2000) Powerful learning environments: Unraveling basic components and dimensions, pp. 55-68. , In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), (Advances in Learning and Instruction Series). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science; Berge, Z.L., Collins, M.P., (1995) Computer-mediated communication and the online classroom, 1-3. , (Eds.)., Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press; Blake, C., Rapanotti, L., Mapping interactions in a computer conferencing environment (2001) Proceedings of the European Perspectives on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, Euro-CSCL 2001, ,, In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarinen (Eds.), University of Maastricht. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from; Blanchette, J., Register choice: Linguistic variation in an online classroom (1999) International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 5 (2), pp. 127-142; Bullen, M., Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education (1998) Journal of Distance Education, 13 (2), pp. 1-32; Craig, S., Gholson, B., Ventura, M., Graesser, A., Overhearing dialogues andmonologues in virtual tutoring sessions: Effects on questioning and vicarious learning (2000) International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, pp. 242-253; Curtis, D., Lawson, M., Exploring collaborative online learning (2001) Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5 (1), pp. 21-34; Fahy, P., Addressing some common problems in transcript analysis (2001) IRRODL Research Notes, 1 (2). ,, The Tutoring Research Group., Retrieved March 10, 2007, from; Fahy, P., Crawford, G., Ally, M., Cookson, P., Keller, V., Prosser, F., The development and testing of a tool for analysis of computer mediated conferencing transcripts (2000) Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 46 (1), pp. 85-88; Flanders, N., (1970) Analysing teacher behaviour, , Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; Fulford, C., Sakaguchi, G., Developing a taxonomy of interaction strategies for twoway interactive distance education television (2001) International Journal of Instructional Media, 28 (4), pp. 375-396; Garfinkel, H., Rawls, A., (2001) Ethnomethodology's programme: Working out Durkheim's aphorism, , ed., Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield; Garrison, R., Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Archer, W., A review of methodological issues in analyzing computer conferencing transcripts (2000) International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12 (1), pp. 8-22; Gilbert, P.K., Dabbagh, N., How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study (2005) British Journal of Educational Technology, 36 (1), pp. 5-18; Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., Anderson, T., Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing (1997) Journal Educational Computing Research, 17 (4), pp. 397-431; Ham, V., Davey, R., Our first time: Two higher education tutors reflect on becoming a 'virtual teacher' (2005) Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42 (3), pp. 257-264; Hammond, M., Wiriyapinit, M., Learning through online discussion: A case of triangulation in research (2005) Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21 (3), pp. 283-302; Hara, N., Bonk, C., Angeli, C., Content analysis of online discussion in an applied psychology course (1998) Instructional Science, 28 (2), pp. 115-152; Harasim, L., Online education: A new domain (1989) Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education, pp. 50-62. , In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.), Oxford: Pergamon Press; Henri, F., Computer conferencing and content analysis (1992) Collaborative learning through computer conferencing, pp. 117-136. , In A.R. Kaye (Ed.), Berlin: Springer Verlag; Hillman, D., (1996) Improved coding and data management for discourse analysis: A case study in face-to-face and computer-mediated classroom interaction, ,, Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from; Hiltz, S., Evaluating the virtual classroom (1990) Online education: Perspectives on a new environment, pp. 133-169. , In L. Harasim (Ed.), New York: Praeger; Howell-Richardson, C., Mellar, H., A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses (1996) Instructional Science, 24, pp. 47-69; Jeong, A., (2005) The effects of supportive styles of communication on group interaction patterns and argumentation in online discussions, transcript analysis discussion, ,, Retrieved April 2008, from; Jonassen, D., Kwon, H., Communication patterns in computer mediated versus. faceto-face group problem solving (2001) Educational Technology Research and Development, 49 (1), pp. 35-51; Jordan, B., Henderson, A., Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice (1995) The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4 (1), pp. 39-103; Kanuka, H., Anderson, T., Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction (1998) Journal of Distance Education, 13 (1), pp. 57-75; Khine, M.S., Lourdusamy, A., Using conversant media as a collaborative learning tool in teacher education (2003) Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19 (2), pp. 260-274; Kuehn, S., Computer-mediated communication in instructional settings: A research agenda (1994) Communication Education, 43, pp. 171-183; LePage, P., Robinson, P., Computer conferencing and the development of habits of mind associated with effective teacher education (2005) Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16 (4), pp. 369-393; Levin, J., Kim, H., Riel, M., Analysing instructional interactions on electronic message networks (1990) Online education: Perspectives on a new environment, pp. 185-214. , In L. Harasim (Ed.), New York: Praeger Publishers; Marcelo, C., Torres, J., Perera, V., Analysing the asynchronous online communication: The development of a qualitative instrument (2002) European Distance Education Network Meeting in Granada, ,, Paper presented at the, June 2002. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from; Marra, R., A review of research methods for assessing content of computer-mediated discussion forums (2006) Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17 (3), pp. 243-267; Marttunen, M., Electronic mail as a pedagogical delivery system: An analysis of the learning of argumentation (1997) Research in Higher Education, 38 (3), pp. 345-363; Marttunen, M., Electronic mail as a forum for argumentative interaction in higher education studies (1998) Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18, pp. 387-405; Mason, R., Evaluation methodologies for computer conferencing applications (1992) Collaborative learning through computer conferencing, pp. 105-116. , In A.R. Kaye (Ed.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag; Mason, R., Romiszowski, A., Computer-mediated communication (1996) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, pp. 438-456. , In D. Jonassen (Ed.), New York: Macmillan; McDonald, J., Interpersonal group dynamics and development in computer conferencing: The rest of the story (1998) Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, , Madison, WI: Continuing and Vocational Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison; McKenzie, W., Murphy, D., "I hope this goes somewhere": Evaluation of an online discussion group (2000) Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16 (3), pp. 239-257. ,, Retrieved March 10, 2007, from; McLoughlin, C., Luca, J., Cognitive engagement and higher order thinking through computer conferencing: We know why but do we know how? (2000) Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching, Teaching and Learning Forum, pp. 219-234. , In A. Herrmann & M.M. Kulski (Eds.), Perth: Curtin University of Technology; Mower, D., A content analysis of student/instructor communication via computer conferencing (1996) Higher Education, 32, pp. 217-241; Murphy, E., Ciszewska-Carr, J., Contrasting syntactic and semantic units in the analysis of online discussions (2005) Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21 (4), pp. 546-566; Newman, D., Webb, B., Cochrane, C., A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning (1995) Interpersonal Computing and Technology Journal, 3 (5), pp. 56-77. ,, Retrieved March 10, 2007, from; Pena-Shaff, J., Altman, W., Stephenson, H., Asynchronous online discussions as a tool for learning: Students' attitudes, expectations, and perceptions (2005) Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16 (4), pp. 409-430; Resta, P., (1995) Project CIRCLE: Student mentors as a strategy for training and supporting teachers in the use of computer-based tools for collaborative learning, ,, Austin: Learning Technology Center, College of Education, The University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from; Riley, N., Methods for evaluating critical learning using online discussion forums (2006) Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15 (1), pp. 63-78; Romiszowski, A., Mason, R., Computer-mediated Communication (2004) Handbook for research in educational communications and technology, , In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., Archer, W., Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing (1999) Journal of Distance Education, 14 (2), pp. 50-71; Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., Archer, W., Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts (2003) E-learning in the 21st century, pp. 129-152. , In D.R. Garrison & T. Anderson (Eds.), London: RoutledgeFalmer; Sinclair, J., Coulthard, M., (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse, , London: Oxford University Press; Vrasidas, C., McIsaac, S.M., Factors influencing interaction in an online course (1999) The American Journal of Distance Education, 13 (3), pp. 22-36; Weiss, R., Morrison, G., (1998) Evaluation of a graduate seminar conducted by listserv, , ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 423 868; Wilson, T., Whitelock, D., What are the perceived benefits of participating in a computer-mediated communication (CMC) environment for distance learning computer science students? (1998) Computers and Education, 30 (3-4), pp. 259-269; Zhu, E., Meaning negotiation, knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course (1996) 18th Annual Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations, pp. 821-844. , In M.R. Simonson, M. Hays, & S. Hall (Eds.), Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology
Uncontrolled Keywords: Asynchronous; Collaborative learning; Computer mediated conferencing; Content analysis; E-learning
Depositing User: National Forum
Date Deposited: 05 Dec 2015 08:54
Last Modified: 05 Dec 2015 08:59

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year