'Just enough to make you take it seriously': Exploring students' attitudes towards peer assessment

McGarr, O. and Clifford, A. M. (2013) 'Just enough to make you take it seriously': Exploring students' attitudes towards peer assessment. Higher Education, 65 (6). pp. 677-693. ISSN 00181560 (ISSN)

[img] Text
McGarr and Clifford 2012.pdf

Download (501kB)
Official URL: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0...

Abstract

The use of peer learning and peer assessment has gained considerable interest in higher education driven by both its educational value and by its ability to provide students with the opportunity to develop important transferrable skills. This paper reports on the use of peer learning and peer assessment with a cohort of four-year undergraduate physiotherapy students and an 18 month taught post-graduate teacher education programme. The study observed the students' engagement in the process, surveyed their opinions on the activity at the end of the experience and conducted one focus group discussion with a subset of students from each cohort. The study found that the vast majority of respondents felt that the experience was valuable and enjoyable. However, when asked to indicate whether it was a fairer method of assessment there were more varied responses. Similarly when asked whether their peers should have a greater say in their overall grade the majority disagreed. Views on the educational value of the experience appeared to differ between the two cohorts of students. The study highlights the influence of a prevailing assessment cultures on students' engagement in peer learning which requires consideration when including such pedagogical approaches. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Cited By :2; Export Date: 23 February 2015; Correspondence Address: Clifford, A. M.; Clinical Therapes, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; email: amanda.clifford@ul.ie; References: Arnold, L., Shue, C., Kritt, B., Ginsburg, S., Stern, D., Medical students views on peer assessment of professionalism (2005) Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20 (9), pp. 819-824; Bloxham, S., West, A., Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment (2010) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (6), pp. 721-733; Boud, D., Cohen, R., Sampson, J., Peer learning and assessment (1999) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24 (4), pp. 413-426; Boud, D., Falchikov, N., Aligning assessment with long-term learning (2006) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31 (4), pp. 399-413; Brousseau, G., (1998) Théorie Des Situations Didactiques, , Grenoble: La pensée sauvage. Coll. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques; Callan, J., Active learning in the classroom: A Challenge to existing educational values and practices (1997) Issues in Education: Changing Education Changing Society, 2, pp. 21-28. , A. Hyland (Ed.), Dublin: ASTI; Davis, N., Kumtepe, E., Aydeniz, M., Fostering continuous improvement and learning through peer assessment: Part of an integral model of assessment (2007) Educational Assessment, 12 (2), pp. 113-135; Falchikov, N., Goldfinch, J., Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks (2000) Review of Educational Research, 70 (3), pp. 287-322; Fook, C.Y., Sidhu, G., Authentic assessment and pedagogical strategies in higher education (2010) Journal of Social Science, 6, pp. 153-161; Gatfield, T., Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment (1999) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24 (4), pp. 365-377; Gleeson, J., O'Grady, D., McGarr, O., Johnston, K., (2001) ICT and School improvement: Executive summary for Ireland, , OECD/CERI ICT PROGRAMME; Gore, J., On the continuity of power relations in pedagogy (1995) International Studies in Sociology of Education, 5 (2), pp. 165-188; Krueger, R.A., Casey, M.A., (2009) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, , London, UK: Sage Publications, Ltd; Langan, A., Wheater, C., Shaw, E., Haines, B., Cullen, W., Boyle, J., Penney, D., Preziosi, R., Peer assessment of oral presentations: Effects of student gender, university affiliation and participation in the development of assessment criteria (2005) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (1), pp. 21-34; Liu, N.F., Carless, D., Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment (2006) Teaching in Higher Education, 11 (3), pp. 279-290; Lortie, D., (1975) Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study, , London: University of Chicago Press; Lurie, S.J., Nofziger, A.C., Meldrum, S., Mooney, C., Epstein, R.M., Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students (2006) Medical Education, 40 (11), pp. 1088-1097; Magin, D., Reciprocity as a source of bias in multiple peer assessment of group work (2001) Studies in Higher Education, 26 (1), pp. 53-63; Nulty, D., Peer and self-assessment in the first year of university (2011) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (5), pp. 493-507; Nuthall, G., The cultural myths and realities of classroom teaching and learning: A personal journey (2005) Teachers College Record, 107 (5), pp. 895-934; Petty, G., (2009) Teaching Today: A Practical Guide, , Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes; Pope, N., The impact of stress in self and peer assessment (2005) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1 (30), pp. 51-63; Ryan, G., Marshall, L., Porter, K., Jia, H., Peer, professor and self-evaluation of class participation (2007) Active Learning in Higher Education, 8 (1), pp. 49-61; Shachar, H., Fisher, S., Cooperative learning and the achievement of motivation and perceptions of students in eleventh grade chemistry classes (2004) Learning and Instruction, 14, pp. 69-87; Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J., Martens, R., Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: Effects on performance and perceptions (2004) Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41 (1), pp. 59-78; Thomson, K., Falchikov, N., Full on until the sun comes out: The effects of assessment on student approaches to studying (1998) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23 (4), pp. 379-390; Topping, K., Peer assessment (2009) Theory Into Practice, 48 (1), pp. 20-27; van Den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., Pilot, A., Designing student peer assessment in higher education: Analysis of written and oral peer feedback (2006) Teaching in Higher Education, 11 (2), pp. 135-147; van Hattum-Janssen, N., Lourenço, J.M., Explicitness of criteria in peer assessment processes for first-year engineering students (2006) European Journal of Engineering Education, 31 (6), pp. 683-691; Vu, T., Dall'Alba, G., Students' experience of peer assessment in a professional course (2007) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32 (5), pp. 541-556; Wen, M.L., Tsai, C.C., Chang, C.Y., Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers (2006) Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43 (1), pp. 83-92; Woolhouse, M., Peer assessment: The participants' perception of two activities on a further education teacher education course (1999) Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23, pp. 211-219
Uncontrolled Keywords: Peer assessment; Peer learning
Depositing User: National Forum
Date Deposited: 04 Dec 2015 21:34
Last Modified: 04 Dec 2015 21:36
URI: http://eprints.teachingandlearning.ie/id/eprint/2951

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year