Text messaging to improve instructor immediacy and its role in multiplatform e-learning systems

Hayes, P. and Weibelzahl, S. (2009) Text messaging to improve instructor immediacy and its role in multiplatform e-learning systems. In: Multiplatform E-Learning Systems and Technologies: Mobile Devices for Ubiquitous ICT-Based Education. IGI Global, pp. 57-71. ISBN 9781605667034 (ISBN)

Full text not available from this resource.
Official URL: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0...


Text messaging has been exploited for supporting learning in a variety of educational settings. However, evidence for its effectiveness and impact is limited. This chapter demonstrates how the use of text messaging can contribute towards enhanced quality of learning. In particular the chapter focuses on the use of text messaging as a means of improving immediacy between instructors and students in third-level education. Immediacy is defined as behaviour which increases psychological closeness between communicators. The results of research in instructional communication suggest that improved immediacy leads to more positive student-instructor relationships engendering positive attitudes, increased interest and motivation by students as well as improved attendance, improved retention, improved student engagement and improved learning. This chapter outlines a theoretical basis for the effect of text messaging on instructor-student relationships, provides empirical evidence for the impact of text messaging on immediacy and discusses the integration of text messaging for improving immediacy in Multiplatform E-Learning Systems. © 2010, IGI Global.

Item Type: Book Section
Additional Information: Cited By :1; Export Date: 23 February 2015; Correspondence Address: School of Computing, National College of IrelandIreland; References: Allen, M., Witt, P.L., Wheeless, L.R., The role of teacher immediacy as a motivational factor in student learning: Using meta-analysis to test a causal model (2006) Communication Education, 55 (1), pp. 21-31; Andersen, J.F., Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness (1979) Communication Yearbook 3, pp. 543-559. , In D. Nimmo (Ed.), New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books; Andersen, J.F., Three investigations exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning (1981) Communication Education, 30 (4), pp. 377-392; Argyle, M., Dean, J., Eye-contact, distance and affiliation (1965) Sociometry, 28 (3), pp. 289-304. , doi:10.2307/2786027; Bloom, B.S., (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, , New York, McKay; Christensen, L.J., Menzel, K.E., The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning (1998) Communication Education, 47 (1), pp. 82-90; Christophel, D.M., The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning (1990) Communication Education, 39 (4), pp. 323-340; Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., (1975) Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Clues, , Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Ellis, K., The impact of perceived teacher confirmation on receiver apprehension, motivation, and learning (2004) Communication Education, 53 (1), p. 1. , doi:10.1080/0363452032000135742; Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W., Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education (1999) The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2-3), pp. 87-105. , doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6; Gorham, J., The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning (1988) Communication Education, 37 (1), pp. 40-53; Gorham, J., Zakahi, W.R., A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and product (1990) Communication Education, 39 (4), p. 354; Hoppe, H., Joiner, R., Milrad, M., Sharples, M., Guest editorial: Wireless and mobile technologies in education (2003) Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19 (3), pp. 255-259. , doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00027.x; Horstmanshof, L., (2004) Using SMS as a Way of Providing Connection and Community for First Year Students, , 5-8 December, Paper presented at the Beyond the Comfort Zone: Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Perth; Houser, C., Thornton, P., Kluge, D., Mobile learning: Cell phones and pdas for education (2002) International Conference Proceedings on Computers in Education, pp. 1149-1150; Kearney, P., Plax, T.G., Wendt-Wasco, N.J., Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college classes (1985) Communication Quarterly, 33 (1), p. 61; Kendon, A., Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction (1967) Acta Psychologica, 26 (1), pp. 22-63. , doi:10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4; Markett, C., Sanchez, I.A., Weber, S., Tangney, B., Using short message service to encourage interactivity in the classroom (2006) Computers & Education, 46 (3), pp. 280-293. , doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.014; McCombs, B.L., Motivation and lifelong learning (1991) Educational Psychologist, 26 (2), pp. 117-127. , doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2602_4; McCroskey, J.C., Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication (1994) 1994 SCA Summer Conference Proceedings and Prepare Remarks, pp. 55-65. , In M. Morreale & S. Brooks (Ed.); McCroskey, J.C., Fayer, J.M., Richmond, V.P., Sallinen, A., Barraclough, R.A., A multicultural examination of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and affective learning (1996) Communication Quarterly, 44 (3), p. 297; McCroskey, J.C., Richmond, V.P., Increasing teacher influence through immediacy (1992) Power in the Classroom: Communication, Control, and Concern, 45, pp. 200-211; Mehrabian, A., Some referents and measures of nonverbal behaviour (1969) Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1 (6), pp. 205-207; Mehrabian, A., (1971) Silent Messages, , Belmont, CA, Wadsworth; Mehrabian, A., (1981) Silent Messages, , 2nd ed., Belmont, CA, Wadsworth; Mehrabian, A., Williams, M., Nonverval concomitants of perceived and intended persuasiveness (1969) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13 (1), pp. 37-58. , doi:10.1037/h0027993; Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., (2004) Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning, , Bristol, NESTA FutureLab; Picard, R.W., Strohecker, C., Papert, S., Bender, W., Blumberg, B., Breazeal, C., Affective learning - A manifesto (2004) BT Technology Journal, 22 (4), pp. 253-269. , doi:10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047603.37042.33; Plax, T.G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J.C., Richmond, V.P., Power in the classroom vi: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning (1986) Communication Education, 35 (1), p. 43; Pogue, L.L., Ahyun, K., The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and affective learning (2006) Communication Education, 55 (3), pp. 331-344. , doi:doi:10.1080/03634520600748623; Rocca, K.A., College student attendance: Impact of instructor immediacy and verbal aggression (2004) Communication Education, 53 (2), pp. 185-195. , doi:doi:10.1080/03634520410001682447; Rodriguez, J.I., Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator (1996) Communication Education, 45 (4), pp. 293-305; Roschelle, J., Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices (2003) Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19 (3), pp. 260-272. , doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00028.x; Ryans, D.G., Research on teacher behavior in the context of the teacher characteristics study (1964) Contemporary Research on Teacher Effectiveness; Sharples, M., Disruptive devices: Mobile technology for conversational learning (2002) International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 12 (5-6), pp. 504-520. , doi:10.1504/IJCEELL.2002.002148; Stone, A., (2004) Mobile Scaffolding: An Experiment in Using SMS Text Messaging to Support First Year University Students, , Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2004, Joensuu, Finland; Witt, P.L., (2000) An Experimental of Teachers' Verbal and Nonverbal Immediacy, Student Motivation, and Cognitive Learning in Video Instruction, , University of North Texas; Witt, P.L., Wheeless, L.R., An experimental study of teachers' verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students' affective and cognitive learning (2001) Communication Education, 50 (4), pp. 327-342; Witt, P.L., Wheeless, L.R., Allen, M., A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning (2004) Communication Monographs, 71 (2), pp. 184-207. , doi:doi:10.1080/036452042000228054; Woods Jr., R.H., Baker, J.D., Interaction and immediacy in online learning (2004) International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5 (2)
Depositing User: Colin Lowry
Last Modified: 27 Nov 2015 09:50
URI: http://eprints.teachingandlearning.ie/id/eprint/2453

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year