Of mice and pens: A discrete choice experiment on student preferences for assignment systems in economics

Flannery, D. and Kennelly, B. and Doherty, E. and Hynes, S. and Considine, J. (2013) Of mice and pens: A discrete choice experiment on student preferences for assignment systems in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 14. pp. 57-70. ISSN 14773880 (ISSN)

[img] Text
Flannery et al 2013.pdf

Download (280kB)
Official URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S...

Abstract

With the development of online open courses, tailoring assignment systems to help students achieve their individual learning objectives will be possible. It is important therefore, from both an educational and business perspective, to understand more about how students value the different characteristics of assignment systems. The main contribution of this paper is the use of a discrete choice experiment to elicit students' preferences for various possible attributes of alternative assignment systems. Our results indicate that students have the strongest preference for assignment systems containing questions that have a high relevance for exam preparation. Our results also indicate that there is a high degree of heterogeneity within the student cohort in their preferences towards various attributes of assignment systems. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Export Date: 23 February 2015; Correspondence Address: Flannery, D.; Department of Economics, University of LimerickIreland; email: darragh.flannery@ul.ie; References: Biggs, J., Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives (2003) Conference on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations, , University of Aveiro, 13-17 April; Birenbaum, M., Assessment and instruction preferences and their relationship with test anxiety and learning strategies (2007) Higher Education, 53, pp. 749-768; Boud, D., Falchikov, N., (2007) Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education, , Routledge London; Cunningham, C.E., Deal, K., Neville, A., Rimas, H., Lohfeld, L., Modeling the problem-based learning preferences of McMaster University undergraduate medical students using a discrete choice conjoint experiment (2006) Advanced in Health Sciences Education, 11, pp. 245-266. , 10.1007/s10459-006-0003-6; De Bekker-Grob, E.W., Ryan, M., Gerard, K., Discrete choice experiments in health economics: A review of the literature (2010) Health Economics, , 10.1002/hec.1697; Dermo, J., E-Assessment and the student learning experience: A survey of student perceptions of e-assessment (2009) British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (2), pp. 203-214; Flannery, D., Kennelly, B., Considine, J., Paper and online assignments in economics: A comparison with panel data (2013) International Review of Economics Education, , (forthcoming); Flores, N., Savage, S., Student demand for streaming lecture video: Empirical evidence from undergraduate economics classes (2007) International Review of Economics Education, 6 (2); Galizzi, M., An assessment of online quizzes and textbook resources on students' learning (2010) International Review of Economics Education, 9 (1); Greene, W.H., Hensher, D.A., A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit (2003) Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37, pp. 681-698. , SEPTEMBER 8 (Elsevier); Grisolía, J.M., Ortúzar, J.D.D., Forecasting vs. Observed outturn: Studying choice in faster inter-island connections (2010) Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44 (3), pp. 159-168; Grisolía, J.M., Willis, K., Heterogeneity in willingness-to-pay for theatre productions: Individual specific willingness-to-pay estimates for theatres, shows and their attributes (2011) Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 58, pp. 378-395; Guest, R., Will flexible learning raise student achievement? (2005) Education Economics, 13 (3), pp. 287-297; Hensher, D.A., Greene, W.H., (2005) Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer, , Cambridge University Press Cambridge; Hurvich, M., Tsai, C., Regression and time series model selection in small samples (1989) Biometrika, 76, pp. 297-307; Hynes, S., Campbell, D., Howley, P., A holistic versus attribute approach to agri-environmental policy valuation: Do welfare estimates differ? (2011) Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62 (2), pp. 305-329; Kennelly, B., Considine, J., Flannery, D., Online assignments in economics: A test of their effectiveness (2011) Journal of Economic Education, 42 (2), pp. 136-146; Lancaster, K.J., A new approach to consumer theory (1966) Journal of Political Economy, 74, pp. 132-157; Lee, W., Courtney, R.H., Balassi, S.J., Do online homework tools improve student results in principles of economics courses? (2010) American Economic Review, 100 (2), pp. 283-286; Louviere, J.J., Pihlens, D., Carson, R.T., Design of discrete choice experiments: A discussion of issues that matter in future applied research (2011) Journal of Choice Modelling, 4, pp. 1-8; McFadden, D.L., (1974) Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour. Frontiers in Econometrics, , Academic Press New York; Price, M., Carroll, J., O'Donovan, B., Rust, C., If i was going there i wouldn't start from here: A critical commentary on current assessment practice (2011) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (4), pp. 479-492; Ryan, M., Gerard, K., Amaya-Amaya, M., (2008) Using Discrete Choice to Value Health and Health Care, , Springer; Scarpa, R., Rose, J., Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: How to measure it, what to report and why (2008) Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52, pp. 253-282; Scarpa, R., Thiene, M., Destination choice models for rock-climbing in the North-Eastern Alps: A latent-class approach based on intensity of participation (2005) Land Economics, 81, pp. 426-444; Scarpa, R., Willis, K.G., Acutt, M., Valuing externalities from water supply: Status quo, choice complexity and individual random effects in panel kernel logit analysis of choice experiments (2007) Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50, pp. 449-466; Swait, J.D., Adamowicz, W.L., The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: A latent class model of decision strategy switching (2001) Journal of Consumer Research, 28, pp. 135-148; Train, K.E., (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, , Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge Cambridge; Trost, S., Salchi-Isfahani, D., The effect of homework on exam performance: Experimental results from principles of economics (2012) Southern Economic Journal, 79 (1), pp. 224-242
Uncontrolled Keywords: Assignment systems; Discrete choice experiment; Latent class model; Student preferences; Willingness to pay
Depositing User: National Forum
Date Deposited: 03 Dec 2015 15:08
Last Modified: 03 Dec 2015 15:10
URI: http://eprints.teachingandlearning.ie/id/eprint/2266

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year