Views of doctors of varying disciplines on HPAT-Ireland as a selection tool for medicine

Kelly, Maureen E. and Gallagher, Niamh and Dunne, Fidelma P. and Murphy, Andrew W. (2014) Views of doctors of varying disciplines on HPAT-Ireland as a selection tool for medicine. Medical Teacher, 36 (9). pp. 775-782. ISSN 0142159X

[img] Text
Kelly et al 2014.pdf

Download (441kB)
Official URL: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true...

Abstract

Background: Selection tools for medicine must achieve political validity and enjoy stakeholder acceptability. This qualitative study aimed to establish the perspectives of doctors, from various clinical specialities, on HPAT-Ireland, a new selection tool for undergraduate medical students. Methods: Fifteen doctors participated over three iterative cycles of recruitment, interviewing and analysis. Prior to interview, participants sat a practice HPAT-Ireland test. HPAT-Ireland has three sections: (1) Logical reasoning/problem solving; (2) Interpersonal understanding and (3): Non-verbal reasoning. Summary of results: Three themes emerged: job relatedness; utility of HPAT-Ireland and diversity. Sections 1 and 2 were considered very job related however Section 3 was widely criticised for lacking clinical relevance. Doctors did not think that the test would reliably predict future performance. However, one-third felt it was acceptable as a selection tool in conjunction with academic record. Those who found it unacceptable were influenced by its perceived narrow focus, limited job relatedness, potential for socioeconomic bias, impact on gender and potential for negative influence on student diversity. Conclusions: A selection tool that does not enjoy the confidence of the medical profession is unlikely to achieve political validity and may ultimately fail, regardless of other objective measures of its effectiveness such as predictive validity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]; Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Kelly, Maureen E. 1 Gallagher, Niamh 1,2 Dunne, Fidelma P. 1 Murphy, Andrew W. 1; Affiliation: 1: National University of Ireland Ireland 2: Health Service Executive Ireland; Source Info: Sep2014, Vol. 36 Issue 9, p775; Subject Term: HIGHER education; Subject Term: INTERVIEWING; Subject Term: RESEARCH -- Methodology; Subject Term: MEDICINE -- Study & teaching; Subject Term: RESEARCH -- Finance; Subject Term: STUDENTS -- Rating of; Subject Term: QUALITATIVE research; Subject Term: JUDGMENT sampling; Subject Term: SCHOOL entrance requirements; Subject Term: DATA analysis -- Software; Subject Term: PHYSICIANS -- Attitudes; Subject Term: IRELAND; NAICS/Industry Codes: 621110 Offices of physicians; NAICS/Industry Codes: 621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists); Number of Pages: 8p; Document Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: HIGHER education; INTERVIEWING; RESEARCH -- Methodology; MEDICINE -- Study & teaching; RESEARCH -- Finance; STUDENTS -- Rating of; QUALITATIVE research; JUDGMENT sampling; SCHOOL entrance requirements; DATA analysis -- Software; PHYSICIANS -- Attitudes; IRELAND
Depositing User: National Forum
Date Deposited: 03 Dec 2015 20:37
Last Modified: 03 Dec 2015 20:41
URI: http://eprints.teachingandlearning.ie/id/eprint/2650

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year