Learning computer science: Perceptions, actions and roles

Berglund, A. and Eckerdal, A. and Pears, A. and East, P. and Kinnunen, P. and Malmi, L. and McCartney, R. and Moström, J. and Murphy, L. and Ratcliffe, M. and Schulte, C. and Simon, B. and Stamouli, I. and Thomas, L. (2009) Learning computer science: Perceptions, actions and roles. pp. 327-338. ISSN 03043797 (ISSN)

Full text not available from this resource.
Official URL: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0...

Abstract

This phenomenographic study opens the classroom door to investigate teachers' experiences of students learning difficult computing topics. Three distinct themes are identified and analysed. Why do students succeed or fail to learn these concepts? What actions do teachers perceive will ameliorate the difficulties facing students? Who is responsible, and for what, in the learning situation? Theoretical work on threshold concepts and conceptual change deals with mechanisms and processes associated with learning difficult material [Meyer, J. and Land, R., 2005. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49 (3), 373-388; Entwistle, N., 2007. Conceptions of learning and the experience of understanding: thresholds, contextual influences, and knowledge objects. In: S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas and X. Vamvakoussi, eds. Re-framing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, chap. 11]. With this work as a background, we concentrate on the perceptions of teachers. Where do teachers feel that the difficulties lie when studying the troublesome knowledge in computing? Student and teacher-centric views of teaching reported in other literature are also to be seen in our results. The first two categories in the 'what' and 'who' themes are teacher-centric. Higher level categories in all themes show increasingly learner centred conceptions of the instructional role. However, the nature of the categories in the 'why' theme reveals a new dimension dealing with teacher beliefs specific to the nature of troublesome knowledge in computing. A number of prior studies in tertiary teaching concentrate on approaches to teaching [Trigwell, K. and Prosser, M., 2004. Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16 (4), 409-424], and attitudes to scholarship of teaching and learning [Ashwin, P. and Trigwell, K., 2004. Investigating educational development. In: Making sense of staff and educational development, 117-131]. Our focus on learning difficult topics extends this work, investigating teacher conceptions of causality in relation to learning difficulties. We argue that teacher conceptions of enabling factors, for learning difficult computing topics, can act to limit the nature and scope of academics' pedagogical responses. Improved awareness of teacher's beliefs regarding student learning difficulties both extends and complements existing efforts to develop a more student-centred computing pedagogy. © 2009 SEFI.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Cited By :9; Export Date: 23 February 2015; Correspondence Address: Pears, A.; Uppsala UniversitySweden; email: arnold.pears@it.uu.se; References: Ashwin, P., Trigwell, K., Investigating educational development (2004) Making Sense of Staff and Educational Development, pp. 117-131. , In: P. Kahn and D. Baume, eds, London: Kogan Page; Berglund, A., (2005) Learning Computer Systems In a Distributed Project Course: The What, Why, How and Where, , Thesis (PhD). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University; Berglund, A., Wiggberg, M., Students learn CS in different ways. Insights from an empirical study (2006) Proceedings of The Eleventh Annual Conference On Innovation and Technology In Computer Science Education, pp. 265-269. , In: M. Goldweber and P. Salomoni, eds, 27-19 June, Bologna, Italy, NewYork: ACM Press; Berglund, A., Learning educational research methods through collaborative research: The PhICER initiative (2008) Tenth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ace 2008), 78, pp. 35-42. , In: Simon and M. Hamilton, eds, of CRPIT Wollongong, NSW, Australia: ACS; Biggs, J., (1987) Student Approaches to Learning and Studying, , Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research; Biggs, J., Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching (1989) Higher Education Research and Development, 8 (1), pp. 7-25; Biggs, J., What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning (1999) Higher Education Research and Development, 18 (1), pp. 57-75; Booth, S., (1992) Learning to Program. a Phenomenographic Perspective, , No. 89 Göteborg Studies in Educational Science Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis; Boustedt, J., (2007) Students Working With a Large Software System: Experiences and Understandings, , Thesis (Licentiate), Uppsala University; Boyer, E., (1997) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of The Professoriate, , Hillsdale, NJ: Jossey-Bass; Bruce, C., Ways of experiencing the act of learning to program: A phenomenographic study of introductory programming students at university (2004) Journal of Information Technology Education, 3, pp. 143-160; Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y., (2003) The Landscape of Qualitative Research, , 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage; Doyle, B.J., Lister, R., A preliminary phenomenographic study concerning student experiences of Unix (2006) Proceedings of The 19th Annual Conference of The National Advisory Committee On Computing Qualifications (naccq), pp. 73-78. , In: S. Mann and N. Bridgeman, eds, Wellington, New Zealand: NACCQ; Dweck, C.S., (1999) Self-theories: Their Role In Motivation, Personality, and Development, , Philadelphia: The Psychology Press; Eckerdal, A., Thuné, M., Novice Java programmers'conceptions of 'object'and 'class', and variation theory (2005) Proceedings of The 10th Annual Sigcse Conference On Innovation and Technology In Computer Science Education. Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 89-93. , In: J.J. Dougherty, ed, NewYork: ACM Press; Entwistle, N., (1981) Styles of Teaching and Learning: An Integrated Outline of Educational Psychology, , Chichester: Wiley; Entwistle, N., Conceptions of learning and the experience of understanding: Thresholds, contextual influences, and knowledge objects (2007) Re-framing the Conceptual Change Approach In Learning and Instruction, , In: S.Vosniadou,A. Baltas and X.Vamvakoussi, eds, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, chap. 11; Hitchcock, L., Methodology in computing education: A focus on experiences (2006) Proceedings of The 19th Annual Conference of The National Advisory Committee On Computing Qualifications (naccq), pp. 109-114. , In: S. Mann and N. Bridgeman, eds, Wellington New Zealand: NACCQ; Kinnunen, P., Through the eyes of instructors: A phenomenographic investigation of student success (2007) Proceedings of The Third International Workshop On Computing Education Research (icer), pp. 61-72. , In: R. Anderson, S. Fincher and M. Guzdial, eds, Atlanta, Georgia, NewYork: ACM Press; Lister, R., The dimensions of variation in the teaching of data structures (2004) Proceedings of The 9th Annual Conference On Innovation and Technology In Computer Science Education (iticse 2004), pp. 92-96. , In: M. Clarke and A. Kumar, eds, Leeds, UK. NewYork: ACM Press; Lister, R., Differing ways that computing academics understand teaching (2007) Ace'07: Proceedings of The Ninth Australasian Conference On Computing Education, pp. 97-106. , In: Simon, ed, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc; Martin, E., What university teachers teach and how they teach it. Instructional Science (2000) Special Issue: Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge In Higher Education, 28 (5-6), pp. 387-412; Marton, F., Booth, S., (1997) Learning and Awareness, , Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass; Marton, F., Säljö, R., On qualitative differences in learning (1976) British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46 (4-11), pp. 115-127; Meyer, J., Land, R., Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning (2005) Higher Education, 49 (3), pp. 373-388; Pajares, F., Self-Efficacy beliefs in academic settings (1996) Review of Educational Research, 66 (4), pp. 543-578; Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., (1999) Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience In Higher Education, , Buckingham: Open University Press; Ramsden, P., (1992) Learning to Teach In Higher Education, , London: Routledge; Simon de Raadt, M., Venables, A., Approaches to lab practical classes among computing academics (2007) Informatics In Education, 6 (1), pp. 215-230; Stamouli, I., Huggard, M., Object oriented programming and program correctness: The students'perspective (2006) Proceedings of The Second International Computing Education Research Workshop (icer), Canterbury, Uk, pp. 109-118. , In: R.Anderson, S. Fincher and M. Guzdial, eds, NewYork: ACM Press; Thompson, E., Hunt, L., Kinshuk, K., (2006) Exploring Learner Conceptions of Programming, pp. 205-211. , Hobart, Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc; Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory (2004) Educational Psychology Review, 16 (4), pp. 409-424; Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Waterhouse, F., Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning (1999) Higher Education, 37, pp. 57-70
Uncontrolled Keywords: Experience of failure; Phenomenography; Student learning difficulties
Depositing User: Colin Lowry
Last Modified: 27 Nov 2015 02:35
URI: http://eprints.teachingandlearning.ie/id/eprint/1774

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year